What is Article 13? We explain the EU's new copyright law - Daddy Tv

YouTube had warned that the European Parliament’s original draft was its worst-case scenario. Others have warned that algorithms often make mistakes, and might take down legitimately used content. In a few weeks, MEPs will vote to decide whether it becomes law. Google has been particularly vocal about the proposed law, which it says could “change the web as we know it”. These are just some of the possibilities, but because of how vague the law is, it’s hard to see how it might be upheld when the time comes. It could also mean the end of some of your favorite news aggregation tools and apps.

Will Article 13 affect video game streamers?

How much of an article has to be shared before a platform has to pay the publisher? Boiled down, all this article is saying is that any websites that host large amounts cm trading broker review of user-generated content (think YouTube, Twitter and Facebook) are responsible for taking down that content if it infringes on copyright. So I recently heard news about the European Union and new laws being passed. Many were freaking about Article 13 and I’m curious as to how bad it is?

An organized campaign against Article 13 warns that it’d affect everything from memes to code, remixes to livestreaming. Almost 400,000 people have so far signed a Change.org petition against the provision. YouTube already uses such a system — called Content ID — to protect copyright infringement, but the technology to do this is extremely expensive and has taken over 11 years to build and refine. Companies including Google, along with free speech advocates and prominent figures within the EU, have opposed parts of the draft legislation.

What is the European Copyright Directive and why are people against it?

This already exists at some scale with YouTube, which has a neural network identify copyrighted works such as TV shows and music. We’ve seen how that works out- frequent errors in judgement with long response times from a company whose business thrives on having content. Imagine how much worse the situation would be if the government ran it, having little-to-no incentive to work to allow incorrectly flagged content. Another controversial rule – which says that search engines and social media providers will have to pay news publishers to feature snippets of their content – also remains. And while the destruction of meme How to buy gencoin culture might be of an annoyance than a disaster there are wider implications. For example, new music tracks remixing and sampling other artists could find themselves blocked.

1. The final version of Article 13 says services must make “best efforts” to remove copyright-protected videos in cases where “the rights holders have provided… the relevant and necessary information”.
2. The EU Copyright Directive that covers how “online content-sharing services” should deal with copyright-protected content, such as television programmes and movies.
3. Each country within the EU will be able to interpret the law and how it should be implemented in its own ways.
4. The European Union has passed a wide-reaching update to copyright laws, the first since 2001.
5. And, knowing the current FCC, the US may actually adopt this as law too since it has a positive effect on business here.
6. To help clear things up, here’s WIRED’s guide to the EU Directive on Copyright.

Elsewhere on the BBC

Article 13 says it shall “in no way affect legitimate uses” and people will be allowed to use bits of copyright-protected material for the purpose of criticism, review, parody and pastiche. Now that the EU has agreed on a final text for the directive, the European Parliament will vote on the legislation. If it passes, it’ll come into force in each EU country over the next two years.

There are numerous exemptions such as cloud storage services while it’s also clear that the phrase “not-for-profit online encyclopedia” is designed to ensure that Wikipedia is exempt. It’s a section of the EU Copyright Directive that covers how online services should deal with high-value copyrighted content. It’s been 18 years since the EU last looked at copyright and, of course, things have changed remarkably in that time. Article 13 says content-sharing services must license copyright-protected material from the rights holders. The European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market is a European Union directive that is designed to limit how copyrighted content is shared on online platforms. EU directives are a form of legislation that set an objective for member states to achieve.

Want to know more about the implications of Article 13 being passed? If we have a deal, the legislation will likely be translated into UK law but if there is no deal we understand that it won’t apply to the UK. There’s also ADSS forex broker the question of gaming footage that’s uploaded to services such as Twitch. The proposed law will face a final vote in the European Parliament in the next few weeks. If it passes, it will be implemented by national governments over the next two years.

There is likely to be a series of campaigns against the changes as well as legal challenges in national and EU courts. Website owners aren’t required to install content monitoring software to detect copyright material, but practically it will be impossible to guarantee a site isn’t infringing the rules without this software. The rules are also intended to challenge the power of tech giants like Google and YouTube, forcing them to pay for content they aggregate.

Like GDPR, all sites that wish to be accessible within the enforcing countries will need to comply with this requirement, obtaining a license from the private software company that is making the copyright ID software. “We understand the significant impact of this event to your businesses and are working to provide relief as soon as possible,” Microsoft said. Mike Gatto, an attorney with law firm Actium and a former California assemblyman, wrote on X, “Dear @, You picked a heck of a week for your business email servers to go down. Love, All of us poor fools working this week.” Monday’s problems with Microsoft 365 comes after a massive outage in July, when banks, airlines, health systems and other industries that rely on the service were hit by a technical problem caused by global cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike.

Those votes happened just weeks after Europe’s last big piece of internet-related legislation — the General Data Privacy Regulation ( GDPR) — kicked in. Although websites less than three years old, or with less than €10 million annual turnover are exempt, the websites will still need to plan for when those caveats no longer apply to them. Unless the Polish court case changes anything – and that’s a big if – individual member states will have two years to turn the new rules into their own national law. To help clear things up, here’s WIRED’s guide to the EU Directive on Copyright.

While Article 13 also requires site owners to implement a complaints process to deal with disputed decisions, Killock says this is unlikely to fix the problem. “Our experience pretty much everywhere is people generally don’t complain. They worry about the effects on their reputation, worry about the legal ramifications, so these tools would have a chilling effect.” Rather than risk further sanctions, users may simply stop making content for online publication. YouTube is by far the most vocal critic of Article 13, with the firm making a big effort to promote opposition to the directive among its creators and users. A popup on the YouTube website and app directs users to a page with the title “#saveyourinternet” which includes a video from YouTube explaining the firm’s objections to the directive.